Lesson-1: The Expedition

A forest Gurukula near the banks of a quiet river. Morning mist still hangs in the trees. The air is cool, filled with birdsong and the smell of damp earth. Golden sunlight filters through the leaves of an old Peepal tree, beneath which sits the physician-teacher, Charaka. In front of him, a dozen young students, newly arrived, sit on mats made of grass and bark.

Charaka:

My dear students,

Before you seek to treat illness, you must first understand life.
Before you gather the herbs, you must understand the earth that gives them.
Before you study the pulse, you must sense the rhythm of day and night, and of the seasons.
Medicine begins not in the mortar and pestle, but in the eye and the ear, the nose, the skin, and the mind that questions.

The students sit in silence, absorbing the gravity of their teacher’s words.

Charaka (continuing): I will not teach you anything today. First, you must go out for an entire month. Walk through forests and villages. Watch the sky and feel the wind. Listen to the cries of birds and observe the silence of rocks. Watch how fire dances and how rivers flow. Smell the soil after rain. Taste the water from different springs. Observe life, when it begins, when it ends, and how it is sustained in between.

Ask yourselves:

       ‘What is the world made of?’
       ‘What do all things, animate and inanimate, share?’

       ‘What sustains life, and what ends it?’ 
       ‘What sustains health, and what causes ill-health?’

       ‘What causes growth, and what causes decay?’
       ‘What properties do things possess: are they light or heavy, soft or hard, hot or cold, stable or moving?’

Split into groups or wander on your own. But wherever you go, 

See, touch, taste, smell, and listen. 
Absorb what you observe.

Do small experiments:

Keep some plants in darkness and others in sunlight,
Water some plants and not the others. 
Remove the soil from the roots of plans and observe what happens.
Watch animals in the wild, and those tamed by men.
Observe death.
See what happens when one animal kills another. 
Speak to villagers.
How do they live? What do they eat?
What keeps them strong or makes them ill?

Return only when your minds are full of questions, not answers.
Do not be in a hurry to find answers, and do not be worried when you have no answers.
Only those who have observed the world deeply are worthy of understanding the body, which is but a mirror of the world. You are not merely to become physicians. You are to become seekers of truth.

#####

The students return after a lunar month. They sit again under the Peepal tree. Their faces are browned by the sun, clothes dusty from travel, minds stirred by wonder.

Charaka: Welcome back, students. I can see in your eyes that you have met the world. Now speak, what did it tell you?

Aaruni: Ācārya, I sat by a waterfall. Its roar was so loud that it overwhelmed me. Later, I entered an empty cave. It was silent, yet I could hear every footstep, even my breath. Sounds felt clearer there, as if that emptiness carried them more sharply.

Charaka: A subtle observation. Our teachers said that sound is born in Ākāśa, space, and travels best where space allows it to flow. In open and empty spaces, like that of a cave, sound is reflected, shaped, and made sharper. Echo arises not just from stone, but from the space around it.

Kumāra: So, Ācārya, they learned this just by watching and listening?

Charaka: Yes. They observed carefully, patiently, but they also asked questions, thought about what they observed. They watched and listened again and again, in silence and in noise, in caves and in open fields. What their eyes could not see, they sensed through sound, touch, and smell. And they arrived at conclusions through reasoning, and they recorded their conclusions, not as final truth, but to share them with others, and as a guide, open to change when new truths arise.

Aaruni: You speak of sound as emerging from Ākāśa—space—as though space gives birth to it. I understand that sound moves through space, but does space truly generate sound? When my hand strikes a drum, it is the impact that produces the sound. If I merely rest my hand on it, the drum remains silent. Is it not the collision, rather than space itself, that causes sound?

Charaka: Your observation is wise, Aaruni. You are right to seek precision. The sound arises from contact, as you describe, but its journey to the ear is made possible by Ākāśa. Space does not cause sound, but it permits sound to be. Ākāśa is the medium that allows the vibration to travel.

Kumāra: Yet, must sound always arise from impact? When I play the flute, there is no clash of solid objects. I breathe into it; the air moves, and music flows out. So even motion within air can give rise to sound.

Aaruni: Indeed! Your flute reveals another nature of sound—born not of collision, but of movement and passage.

Bhadraka: Ācārya, I stayed near a river. Some days the wind rushed, bending trees and raking up dust-storms. Some days it felt cold and rough, and other days it was gentle and barely touched the skin. But always, when it moved, I could feel it. And I was wondering: what causes the air to move? 

Charaka: Indeed. That which moves, and that which touches, we do not see it, but we feel it. Wherever there is movement, there is Vāyu. The property of touch (Sparśa) arises from Vāyu. 

Raghu: I watched fire, Ācārya, in lamps, in kitchens, and in the cremation ground. Fire consumes what is fed to it; fire transforms; fire produces warmth. The raw becomes cooked, the cold becomes warm. And always, it gives light. When fire burns something, it changes its colour.

Charaka: Yes. Fire alone reveals form. Only in the presence of fire or Sunlight do things become visible. Without fire, there is no digestion, no perception, no vision, only darkness and ignorance. Where there is light and visibility (Rūpa), there is fire, Agni.

Raghu: But we can see the flames of the fire in the forest. We can see the flames that cook the vegetables we eat. We cannot see the fire that digests the food. Does the fire in our stomach have flames? Why doesn’t it cook our stomach?

Charaka smiled and nodded his head.

Caraka: That is a good question, Raghu. But I want you to think about it, discuss it in your group, and come back with an answer. But I can give you a hint, which is hidden in your question. Could there be more than one kind of fire?

Raghu: I will chase that question, Ācārya.

Shaunaka: Ācārya, I drank water from springs, wells, lakes, and rivers. Each had a different taste: sometimes sweet, sometimes salty or metallic. But always, it was water that gave the taste. So I was wondering: is water always necessary for us to taste something?

Charaka: You have touched the heart of matter. Taste -Rasa-arises only in water, Āpas. The wetness that dissolves and delivers flavour, this is water’s gift. Without water, the tongue is mute.

Katyayana: Ācārya, I stayed with farmers. After rains, the earth releases a smell like nothing else, a rich, heavy fragrance from the mud. It clings to the nose. Plants, trees, grass, and flowers, everything that arises from soil has a fragrance. Mountains, stones, soil, they all carry weight and smell.

Charaka: How wonderful is that! Thus, you arrive at the grossest unit. Smell -Gandha- arises from Earth, Pṛthvī. That which gives mass, form, and structure, bones, teeth, stone, fruit, all have Earth.

Charaka looks around, at all the students, with pride and pleasure.

Charaka (summarising): You have done well. Just as the senses inform us of the world, the Mahābhūtas arise from those very sensations:

Ākāśa -Space- gives sound
Vāyu -Air- gives touch and sound
Agni -Fire- gives visibility, touch, and sound
Āpas -Water- gives taste, visibility, touch, and sound
Pṛthvī -Earth- gives smell, taste, visibility, touch, and sound

As we go from the subtle to the gross, the number of perceivable qualities increases. And from these five arise all bodily tissues, all food, all medicine. But don’t accept what I have summarised just because I am your teacher.  You have to question it. Look for evidence against what I am saying. Correct it, and improve upon it.

Aaruni: Ācārya, if all things are made from these five, why do we see thousands of different things around us?

Charaka: An excellent question. Think of how many different dishes can be prepared from just a few basic ingredients. In the same way, all five Mahābhūtas are present in everything, but in different proportions. That is why milk, stone, oil, leaf, and flesh differ, even though all are composed of the same five Mahābhūtas.

Shaunaka: Is Ākāśa truly a substance if it is just empty space?

Charaka: Ākāśa is not nothingness. Imagine a clean wall with nothing written on it. Now imagine you draw a circle on that wall. The circle exists on the surface of the wall. But is that wall still nothingness? Is emptiness the same as nothingness? Emptiness is that which permits existence. Without space, nothing could reside, and no sound could form.

Aaruni: Ācārya, if everything is made up of the Mahābhūtas, why do some things live while others remain lifeless?

Charaka: Ah, a question that reaches beyond matter. That which lives possesses something more, something subtle, yet essential. We call it Jīvātman, the animating principle that distinguishes the living from the non-living. But that, my dear students, is a subject for another day.

Charaka paused for a while so that the students could grasp the depth of the matter before asking them to disperse.

#####

 

 

 


Comments

8 responses to “Lesson-1: The Expedition”

  1. Dr.V.K.M.Lavanya Avatar
    Dr.V.K.M.Lavanya

    “Before you seek to treat illness, you must first understand life.
    Before you gather the herbs, you must understand the earth that gives them.”
    Appropriate words 👌👌👍

  2. Vaidya kumaraswamy B. V Avatar
    Vaidya kumaraswamy B. V

    I am overwhelmed by the approach and the narration is like a Kavya a poetry, ang it touches our base and brings sence of Ananda. I am in a state of imagination to see it as reality. I will send more detail mail. I will also share my endevours from 1982 and experiences.

  3. Sandeep S Patwardhan Avatar
    Sandeep S Patwardhan

    I could visualize the conceptualization of panhabhuta sidhanta in ancient times. The writing is interesting and captivating. At the same time, simple to understand. Great initiative. Looking forward to reading many more. This exercise is perhaps also a lesson in itself on “pramana” as well.

    1. Does rain falling through the space/air produce sound, or is it its fall on the ground producing it? In the case of the flute, air passing through the space bound by Prithwi is giving the sound, right?
    2. Are not Panchabhoota facilitators of shabda, sparshadi, rather than “givers” – e.g. agni only facilitates visibility, it is Prithwi or Jala, which becomes visible?

    1. Maithreya Sharma Avatar
      Maithreya Sharma

      Namaskaram 🙏
      This write up is really catchy and beautiful. Acharya Charaka truly looks like a historic hero with all those wondefully sounding punchlines. (Many of those actually could be used in Padartha Vijnana Classes!)

      But I couldn’t help myself from noticing an important point:
      Acharya Charaka is teaching Panchamahabhutas to the students infront of him who have come to study how to treat illness.
      But actually, the learning of Ayurveda in Gurukulas began only after one mastered the Vyakarana, the Darshanas and more of such preparatory disciplines, and these students would be well versed in multiple interpretations of just the Panchamahabhuta theory itself. Explaining such a superficial version of Panchamahabhuta theory would be more than enough for those students to take a TC from that Gurukula and go to some other Gurukula. 😀

      1. This is a common attitude among many purists to label something to be superficial without explaining what they consider to be deep. It is a well known tactic used to distract debate.

        Thanks.

        1. Maithreya Sharma Avatar
          Maithreya Sharma

          Dear Sir,

          Dismissing a genuine critical comment as a tactic seems more like a tactic to distract debate. I am not a purist or a believer, but have always tried to arrive at a conclusion by trying to disprove a principle. I have only accepted the theories that I am convinced of, and have discarded the others. I am open to debate, but I would prefer a group discussion and brain storming. A debate is often intended to defeat the opponent whereas a group discussion with constructive criticism with the sole objective of discovering the truth is always beneficial for developing not just the discipline but also the self.

          This write up is very interesting to read and showcases not just the language skills, but also the creativity of the author. But examining the content feels as if the author has some pre-existing notions or interpretation about Panchamahabhutas that he has conceived, and he has made the students to pass specific comments and specific questions so that the Acharya can say the answers according to the author’s notions and interpretations. However in reality, even the Panchamahabhuta theory has been interpreted differently by different Darshanas, all these views being complementary and context-specific. For instance, the Panchamahabhuta theory of Sankhya is based on a subjective awareness of the universe which happens inside the individual, and they consider Panchamahabhutas as a subjective reality (that is Ahankarika in nature). The Vaishehikas consider Panchamahabhutas as an objective reality and have included them under the Navakarana dravyas. The Advaita Vedantins consider Panchamahabhutas as the sole building blocks of the illusionary universe that is born directly out of consciousness. There are more philosophies and multiple sects under each of these philosophies, with each interpretation being models which are more and more context-specific and super-detailed. This also proves that we don’t have a single theory of Panchamahabhutas across Darshanas. Ayurveda seems to adopt multiple interpretations in different contexts, which again are context specific and are intended to solve the problem of diseases.

          With the exceptional skills in language and creativity that the author has, I personally would love to read a similar storyline being constructed over some of the basic theories that are Darshana-based and solely focuses on bringing out the phenomenal debates and discussions on these matters which are present in the texts of these Darshanas. After a thorough churning of these theories, then coming to Ayurveda would bring much more clarity and facilitate students to not just ask artificially created questions, but any natural question that they feel like and still get a convincing answer.
          Because I am still a student, I would like to start the discussion with a couple of genuine doubts that I would ask, in place of Aaruni, Bhadrakali, Kumara,etc.

          Acharya:
          “You have touched the heart of matter. Taste -Rasa-arises only in water, Āpas.

          Maithreya: When I tasted powdered Sugar it was sweet, and when I tasted chili powder it was so hot in taste! These are dry in nature. So how can we substantiate that taste arises only in water?

          Acharya: “How wonderful is that! Thus, you arrive at the grossest unit. Smell -Gandha- arises from Earth, Pṛthvī. That which gives mass, form, and structure, bones, teeth, stone, fruit, all have Earth”

          Maithreya: But Acharya, the smell arose from soil only when it was wet. And even the stones, bones and teeth doesn’t give away any smell. So how can you say that smell arises from Earth?

          Expecting replies from Acharya Charaka 🙂

  4. Amit Nakanekar Avatar
    Amit Nakanekar

    This is a very beautiful narration connecting today’s generation to the ancient world when probably samhita were narrated. This also visualize the gap between two different teaching methodlogies yet it is able to establish the link between the same. I really like this.

  5. Caraka: Maithreya, understand this with steadiness. Pṛthivī holds the seed of gandha in all its forms. Yet gandha does not become known until some other factor loosens what is held within earth.

    When flowers bloom the breeze carries their subtle essence to the nose. When rain falls it loosens the soil and the gandha that was bound becomes free. Candana yields its fragrance when rubbed with water upon a stone because moisture and friction release its inner principle. Elā gives scent even when dry, but only after pounding opens its particles.

    Rocks also are formed of pṛthivī. Most of the time their essence is firmly bound. When they are crushed, heated, or wetted, whatever subtle principle is held within them may then be released and can reach the ghrāṇendriya.

    Therefore know this. The earth is the support of gandha, but its manifestation requires that the bound essence be freed and carried. Without such a carrier or such an action the gandha remains hidden.

    Maithreya: What about taste? I can perceive the taste of dried pippali. It doesn’t have to be always water, I guess.

    Caraka: Maithreya, dried pippali indeed have rasa. Yet one whose mouth is dry cannot sense even strong tastes. Rasa is known only when the substance meets moisture on the tongue. When the mouth lacks this moisture, taste cannot arise.

    #####

    Dr. Azad: You have read the exchange between Caraka and Maithreya. Tell me what it explains.

    Kabir: It shows that earth holds the potential for smell. But smell appears only when something frees what is inside. Rain, breeze, rubbing, or pounding can do that.

    Aarav: And rocks can smell if they contain gases or other substances. Crushing or wetting can release them. So odor needs movement or a carrier.

    Rohan: The same idea applies to taste. Dry spices have rasa, but the tongue needs saliva. Without moisture the taste cannot reach the sense organ.

    Kabir: But Caraka did not know about receptors and taste buds. Right?

    Dr. Azad: Obviously. He did not have tools to study those structures. Yet he observed that taste depends on moisture and that smell needs released volatiles. His conclusions match basic sensory principles.

    Aarav: And the dryness of mouth makes sense in clinical terms too.

    Dr. Azad: Yes. In conditions such as Sjogren syndrome there is marked reduction in salivary secretion. Many patients show impaired taste. Clinical studies confirm this. So the classical claim that rasa cannot be perceived without moisture is consistent with what we see in such disorders.

    Rohan: So his observation holds true, right?

    Azad: Yes!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *